General Forums >> Ask a Firefighter >> Poll: Did Firefighter Error Allow Home to Burn?
Poll: Did Firefighter Error Allow Home to Burn?
Poll: Did Firefighter Error Allow Home to Burn?
|
56 posts back to top |
Posted 5 months ago What do you guys think? http://firelink.monster.com/news/articles/7640-did-firefighter-error-le... |
|
1020 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago
Chris,
In this day and age we should not be involved in heroics unless a life is in danger. It sounds like the fire had advanced and they took a defensive stand having limited water supply and an empty house. The article does not state if
sufficient staffing was on the scene. It also sounds like there is a large amount of political bovine excrement involved, Mayor vs. candidate.
Fire load
Old structure (usually a nightmare of a maze)
No life in danger
Limited water supply
Sorry – that’s what insurance is for.
We are not to sacrifice our lives for someone’s material possessions. They can and will be replaced. Our families can’t replace us.
As of today 6/18/09: WE HAVE LOST 50 MEMBERS.
I posted "LODD - NIOSH Report Alabama" open it up. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face200834.html
Look at the findings. Bottom line, NIOSH says they should have been only a defensive attack due to fire load, limmited staff & water supply.
Omnis Cedo Domus |
|
679 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago It is incredibly sad to hear that their house was a total loss, however, the Firefighters are not to blame, it is not their fault that there was no water pressure, i have never heard of a city having 4 inch mains, i think the homeowners should be talking to a lawyer about suing the city, I mean come on....you know the guys who built the city and put in those small mains knew that fire protection was an issue and just wanted to save money and put in the smaller mains, shame on whoever gave the "ok" on putting 4 inch mains (disgusted) when your tired... i mean tired... and you think you have given everything, dig deep, you have more.... it comes from within |
|
295 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago There are 2 points to this...The first being that the firefighters didn't install the 4" water line that didn't provide enough water. The second is the fact that the firefighters didn't start the fire. How can it be thier fault? We have to work with the cards we are given every day. We do the best we can, and sometimes no matter what we do we loose the battle. Ed Excellence can be attained if you - care more than others think is wise - risk more than others think is safe - dream more than others think is practical - and expect more than others think is possible. - Anonymous |
|
47 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago rome21 says ...
ok here is my two cent. I was not on the call so I do not know the whole story, but this is what I did get from the artical. Disp. was at 0356 am, three Eng's and a ladder got there five min. after disp. at 0401 am. two more Eng's at 0402 and another two at 0414. Now you are looking at 20 min from 0401 when the first trucks got on scean to 0421 when the started to complain about water problems. Last time I cheaked it did not take 20 min to catch a plug and find out if it works or not. then it took them 34 min to find a new plug when all this time they had 7 Eng's with 3500 to 7000 gallons to use wile the looked for a new plug.
To me they did not use the cards they were given that day. they should of know that the plug there had now pressure if they do any type af hydrent tests
I am in know way trying to degrade anybody i am just giveing my two cents on how I read the story |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago To me being where I am from, our town only has smaller mains also if I remember corectly. We just had this descushion a couple days ago while doing a preplan for the church in town and what we would do for water. We have a pump house that we use to fill our trucks that if it was close enouigh to the fire could be hooked up to but that would put out the water needed for a big fire. Even our hydrents are questionable. So as far as not having the water I see where that is a problem. To me the question I would have is why didn't you start drafting? I know that was a topic ahile back about drafting and it being a "rural thing" but even in a city you never know when you will need it. |
|
150 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I don't know why anyone would want to blame the Firefighters, They were only trying to do a job the were called to do. When the going its tough the tough get going in! |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago IT WAS NOT FIREFIGHTER ERROR IT WAS POLITICAL ERROR ITS NOT IN THE BUDGET THAT IS WHAT ALL OF US HEAR. ELECT ME AND I WILL FIX IT IS WHAT WE HEAR FROM NEW PEOPLE RUNNING FOR OFFICE AND WHAT DO THEY DO WHEN ELECTED THEY SAY ITS NOT IN THE BUDGET. BUT IF THEY WANT IT ITS DONE. CHECK OUT YOUR POLITATIONS AGENDA AND YOU WILL FIND OUT WHATS IN THE BUDGET AND WHATS NOT. ITS EVERYONES ERROR EXCEPT THE ELECTED OFFICIAL WHO HAS THE OVER ALL CONTROL. |
|
17 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago The firefighters are not at fault. They didn't lay the water main so therefore they didn't know what was there. They did what they was trained to do which is put out the fire at the best of there abillities. I feel they did that. |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago
in regards to who was at fault. i serve on a city fd, we have hydrants color coded (NFPA) lets us know whats what. several years ago we had a large indusrtial fire in an orange top hydrant area,250gpm at best. we called for the county water shuttle , which provided over 400,000 gal. of water ,as well as the hydrants. i also serve on a volunteer dept. we have no hydrants we rely soley on our tank water (1000) on our engine and (3000) on our tanker. we also train heavily on drafting , from pools , ponds ect. now in toledo i do not know if their hydrants are coded (perhaps not) , and i was not there, but there is a rural area with tankers perhaps they should put those units on boxes where water is limited,and train with them. i think with what they had on hand and the extent of the fire upon arrival, as well as no other contingincy plan available they did the best they could. stay low , stay safe |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago You can preplan and should you can have 100 fire fighters on had without water we are just driving around. This is more of a political battle and at this time the Fire Department are the sacrficial goats right now. An eight inch main for the supply and multiple engines how soon before that water line is not enough. Hey guys get your infrstructure in place to help support your town or just blame everyone and fix nothing. The team did the best they could with what they had. |
|
78 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago My FD tests every hydrant in the city twice a year. This is done because it helps find water pressure problems, it keeps the crews familiar with the hydrants in their area, and it allows the see how much water they get out of the hydrant. Had this been the case here, I suspect that there would have been a back up plan in place... Just my $.02. |
|
869 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago As a point of reference... not all Fire Departments do hydrant tests. Some cities choose to use the public service or water departments to do these tests. We can all stand back and attempt to judge the actions and intent of these Firefighters or we can learn from this incident and be better prepared to be more effective and efficient Firefighters in our own communities. Eddie D. Howard
|
|
135 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I'll agree with Ravenfirefighter his wording makes perfect sense. It happened its over and done with people just want to point fingers. But fail to look at it someone could have been inside however there was no one in it. It was property yeah it can be replaced lifes can not. Live and learn. |
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago As an ex-wife of a water department employee, in a city where the water dept does all the testing on hydrants, it's kinda hard not to stick up for the firefighters. There is absolutely no way they allowed the home to burn. I suspect that they had 'ok' water pressure until the 3rd crew arrived. At that point in time, I imagine there was a noticeable drop in pressure (just like if you get in the shower and two people at opposite ends of the house turn water on -- there's none left in the middle. As for the yahoo who says the citizens shouldn't have to pay taxes to have the pressure and line increased -- HELLO??? Do you have a magic wand that will allow you to reconfigure the size of the water lines.to add more pressure? If so, my I please borrow it? I'm sorry for the family who lost everything, insurance won't cover all of the memories or the pictures of family members. I know, I just went through a fire. All I can say is if the citizens of the fair state of Tennessee, want better protection, they need to think about shaping the department and helping to get biger means to light the other end of a rough tunnel. I assure you if the citizens don't want to get the proper equipment someone needs to be tackling getting the insurance to pay. |
|
238 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago I personly think that it is the departments responsibility to know what water resourses are available to them in their call areas. All fire fighters should know where hydrants are located and what supplies them. However I do not believe that the fire fighters here just let that house burn down, nor should they be held accountable. Obviously there is going to be a drop in pressure when that many lines are being suppplied off 1 hydrant. Fire fighters on the incident should have forseen that. But still I would not hold them accountable or responsible. Also, there should have been someone overseeing the incident, a supervisor of some sort. That was the person responsible for locating additional water supplies or calling in more resources to deliver an adequit supply. Since the situation was not anticipated earlier, there probably should have been adjustments made to the plan immediately upon realization of pressure loss. Without reading the full report, we have no way of knowing whether any of these things were considered and/or evaluated. But I still would not lay blame on the fire fighters. Im sure that they did the best job that they could with the resources that they had available. There may or may not have been mistakes made, but I do not believe they determined the final out come. The home was already engulfed when the first team arrived, It was probably already a total loss, why risk fire fighters or their equipment ? Everyday we hear people complaining about the quality of the fire service in their commmunities, yet when the day comes to vote, they vote down any extra funding that would improve the departments abilities to protect them. Go figure?! Everyone still wants their cakes.... |
|
78 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago firedup says ...
Oh, I hear you on this one. Our city is broke. They are asking for a 10% cut of all department's budget. This will include laying off at least 7 firefighters. The public should be up in arms about this, as we aren't meeting any of the NFPA standards as it is due to a shortage of manpower. But they are screaming to lay off firefighters and cops...according to them, we don't do anything anyway, and, besides, it's just temporary, right? *exasperated sigh* Sometimes I wonder. |


