General Forums >> Volunteering >> its only a volunteer department

Rate

its only a volunteer department

305 Views
30 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Confinedspace_max50

341 posts

back to top

Posted 17 days ago

 

Not only on here but more and more through the volunteer community i have been hearing more and more of "im just a volunteer" or "I shouldnt have to do that i am a volunteer and i can do what i want."


These kind of comments get at me because in my opinion the only volunteering that you do is signing your name to the bottom of that application.  After that its doing whatever ever it takes to keep that department running and keeping those trucks rolling out the doors to emergencies.


To many times i read or hear i know its just a volunteer department that is why there is nothing we can do about it.  But yet these so called people that say they are only volunteers are saying that they are unpaid professionals.  Well what is making these guys professionals if they are not taking the classes or helping to keep that business (fire dept) afloat.  Maybe im wrong in my thinking, what does everyone else think?

105773-marine-corps_max50

721 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 17 days ago

 

I agree that it does take people to run a FD even tho it's a volunteer dept. Not only do you "volunteer" your time but you make a commitment to the dept by being there when you can. I realise that people have other jobs when working on a volunteer dept and families and what not, and that's understandable, but the least you can do is put some time in. But I have seen a volunteer dept become more like a full time dept and have pissed alot of people off. I know of a dept that assumes that all their "volunteers" will do this and that and that does piss me off. In that same dept a FF was fired cause he didnt go to ALL the trainings cause he has a family and a job to deal with and that pissed me off. To kick a guy off the dept cause he has other obligations and cant be there everyday I think is rediculos. My dept especially is getting this way and it sucks. Like I said it's becoming more like a full time dept and that we have to be at every thing that happens. Dont get me wrong, I love what I do and it is a career choice for me. I love to volunteer and do things in the dept but I have a life to live of my own. i do keep up with all my trainings and such, I make sure of that.  


"Hell, these are Marines. Men like them held Guadalcanal and took Iwo Jima. Bagdad ain't shit." "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem." United States Marine Corps

Picture_011_max50

313 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 17 days ago

 

I agree. It's somewhat like people saying the national guard or reserves aren't soldiers! I wonder if an Iraqi knows or cares about the difference? Or if the average joe who sees a fire truck going down the road knows the difference? We are all the real deal when they need us, and they expect the real deal when we get there!

2650_1064697815572_1169790161_30221108_8265285_n_max50

12 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 17 days ago

 

I'm in agreance too. My department understands people have jobs and families. But they still ask that you atleast make 5 runs a month including a night run. They also ask that you attend the monthly training companies. They are offered once in the morning and once in the evening every 3rd Wednesday and Thursday. We also have monthly meeting every 2nd Thursday of the month. If you can't make it then you call in. You are told when the training events are and if you can make those then you have make-up training. All that is is a sheet of paper full of questions relating to the training events you missed. You are given like a week or two to get it done. If you are a no-call and continually miss meetings and training events then apparently you are too busy with work and family and you kindly let go untill you have a better schedule. No hard feelings or anything.

105773-marine-corps_max50

721 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 17 days ago

 

In the state of kentucky on a volunteer department have at least a minimum of 20 training hours every year....


"Hell, these are Marines. Men like them held Guadalcanal and took Iwo Jima. Bagdad ain't shit." "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem." United States Marine Corps

Mom_s_pictures-76_max50

2 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 17 days ago

 

I don't think people should be paid for doing something they love....I find alot of times people only enjoy having the Title "firefighter" but dont  want to do the work that comes along with it.

145_max50

86 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 16 days ago

 

    I am torn on this subject.  I was once a career firefighter and after a change I am now a volunteer officer with a family and a demanding work schedule.  I am also on administrative call for work every other week.  There are many times that I get up at 7:00 on Sunday, go to the FD to instruct a drill session until 11:00 or noon, go to work until 3:00, and then to a soccer game until dinner time.  Hopefully there are no calls during this time frame or that screws the whole pooch.


    I can totally understand the whole "I am only a volunteer" attitude as honestly I feel that way quite often myself.  But then I also think that I made this commitment - no one forced me.  In our line of work - yes it is work, pay or not - technology, regulations, etc change rapidly.  Gone are the days of "put the wet stuff on the red stuff."  We owe it to our customers - the public - to be proficient in all aspects of this job.  They are calling on us when they need help.  They will not want to hear "Sorry, I can't do that effectively as I was too busy to learn it.  I am only a volunteer you know."  That will surely open litigation against your agency, town, officers, and you.


    What about our own safety and that of our crews?  Fire is fire.  It will kill you just as dead - pay or no.  We owe it to our families and department (see I put family first for a reason) to be a highly trained as possible so we do not get ourselves into a bad situation unnecessarily.  There will be always a risk to us.  That is the nature of our business.   We need to learn when the risk outweighs the benefit.  If it does, we need to be as efficient and proficient as possible.  This comes to us through that training.


     What some departments are doing in our area to entice the volunteers coming to this important training and other necessary events is to institute a LOSAP (Length Of Service Award Program).  This is basically a retirement plan for volunteers that is based upon how active you are.  Those that are committed will be rewarded when it comes time for them to retire.  Those who were not will not collect as much.


My 2 cents.


   

1_15_06_07_4_31_51_144_max50

73 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 14 days ago

 

i agree with everyone we should do what we need to. i was going to school on three hours away from my department i told them i was going to school and would help on the weekends when i was home like work on the out of service truck and go to calls, they were good with that. I got a call the other day saying they need my gear and radio cause they didnt need me anymore.


whats up with that?

2844_1173571258244_1196910066_30465865_2801821_n_max50

4 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 14 days ago

 

     Capt. Mike I'm torn also on the subject, but in another way.  I'm still in college right now, and taking a heavy course load so obvioiusly being a career firefighter isn't really an option right now, though it's what I want to do as a career.  So I'm a volunteer, and I have no problem with being a volunteer.  I also have no problem doing the dirty, boring work along with everyone else.  I'm at a combination department though, and sometimes it's difficult doing the boring work because the guy next to me is making 15 bucks an hour, and he's doing the same thing.  I still do it anyways with the rationale that becoming a firefighter means that you do everything a firefighter does, and that includes the shit work.  I'm fed up with people complaining about it because it seems to me that if you signed up to get into this business you didn't sign up for a social club, you signed up for a "job", no matter what sense you want to use "job" in.

Sdc10936_max50

19 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 14 days ago

 

Being Paid does not make you a Proffesional, I work shift work and I have a Family but I know when the page goes off, Someone is having a bad day and it don't matter if I'm asleep or eating I GO. Not meaning to change the subject but, Is there a NFPA standard or State law that says how many hours you are required to train each year?


                                                                                                           

Picture_036_max50

1661 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 14 days ago

 

Manda24 says ...



I don't think people should be paid for doing something they love....I find alot of times people only enjoy having the Title "firefighter" but dont  want to do the work that comes along with it.



I think we should all be paid to do what we love. Then it wouldn't be like going to work. Kind of like what I do. I am paid as a PMDC at one job. I am paid as a FF at the other job. I love being at, and doing, both....even when the work is difficult. I'm glad to have that. I volunteered for a long time before I went paid. Without the volunteer department (and training), I would have neither.


The largest room is the room for self improvement

Confinedspace_max50

341 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

I completely understand that nobody can commit all of there time but i feel that if you want to be in a department then there should be some sort of strong commitment.  In my department we have training and worknights every monday of the month and our meetings are on tuesdays.  It has been like that since as long as i can remember.  Now i understand things come up, people work shift work and such, but everyone knows that those are set dates.  I just cant buy it that people say they are to busy to show up 5 days a month.  i would be happy if some of the guys will show up to two trainings a month.  But yet these people will show up for calls, and not just any call, it has to be a big one for them to show up.  How can i feel secure putting them in an active role on the fire ground when they wont show up to learn how things are being done, especially if something has changed?

2844_1173571258244_1196910066_30465865_2801821_n_max50

4 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

I understand what you mean hallberg... the ones that always show up scarcely are the ones who think a run is "good enough" to warrant their response.

Confinedspace_max50

341 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

Exactly!  But what do you do with them, if you pull privileges they quit or get mad and show up even less, or you just let it keep goin on and then others feel they can get away with it also.  Ive dropped subtle hints to some of them and it seems to work for a little while but then they go right back into that state of ok im gonna show up if its something i can tell all my buddies about and make me look like a hero

023_max50

504 posts

    

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

If they want to quit then let them. You won't miss them if they aren't pulling there weight or making the calls anyway. 

Dsc00384_max50

14 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

I've noticed alot of volunteer departments dont do as thorough psych evals as paid departments do, I believe the situations stems from this, The guys that dont do anything, dont show up, or say im not doing that, im not paid for it, etc..., are only signing to get the title,(for whatever reason they want to use it for) Its dangerous to the department, fellow firefighters, as well as the public they serve. You choose to VOLUNTEER, knowing you wont be getting paid from before you sign the contract for doing everything a full-time paid firefighter would. Personaly, I dont want these types of people working behind me, It potentially puts my life in danger because they dont want to do something. DONT LIKE IT OR DONT WANT TO DO ALL THE WORK= DONT SIGN THE CONTRACT OR QUIT. 

2844_1173571258244_1196910066_30465865_2801821_n_max50

4 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

Yeah I'm agreeing with the "let them quit" attitude.  Tell them how it is and if they don't like it it's "Thanks, but your services are no longer needed."  I think it is dangerous JWINFREE, since we're talking about people who have let training go by the wayside.  Lots of them remember how it was done "back in the day" during the 50s when they joined, and won't really keep up with the times.  It's a lot different now than "back in the day;" we don't just go charging ahead yelling at whatever type of fire we have no matter where it is.  I think its just as in most cases where the few give everyone a bad name, since these few lead everyone to the conclusion that volunteers in general are bad.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

I agree with you weifert, let them qiut.  The ones that only show up when they the run is "good enough" for their response are only endangering the rest of the department.  When showing up for training or meetings we form bonds and gel with the other members of the department, which can only help increase safety at the scene.  I personally would be uneasy of having a member back me up if they were not up to speed with the latest training or sop's.    A suggestion for hallberg, mandate requirements for training.  Being required to attend a certain percentage of trainings may help in the weeding process, i.e. DON'T  MEET THE MINIMUM TRAINING REQUIREMENT YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO RESPOND.  I know that sounds harsh and yes they may leave but then hopefully you would be able to fill the spot with someone who is more dedicated to the department.  What we do is NOT a hobby!!!!!

145_max50

86 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 13 days ago

 

This is also my sentiments.  As I said earlier we have a commitment to our families and department to be safe and keep up on training.  We do have a minimum training requirement (and boy do I mean minimum).  12 hours a year.  We hold 2 drills a month - not to mention special training details.  I just did 6 last month on bailout procedures.  Fire schools count as a drill, so take something like HazMat Ops and you're golden.  Officers are required to attend at least 50% of all drills and special trainings, but then again if we are leading these guys, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard.


As for the guys who legitimately cant make the time due to personal commitments, I would talk to your officers and see if your can take a leave from active duty.  Make the training when you can, but don't expect to automatically get the knob at the big one.


My 2 cents

Freedom_max50

1 post

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted 11 days ago

 

USMCFF413 says ...



In the state of kentucky on a volunteer department have at least a minimum of 20 training hours every year....



My company mandates 36 annual training hours.


Stylizedflames_max50

35 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 11 days ago

 

Here i what I put on another topic. I feel it fits here s well.......


I think somtimes recruitment takes priority over retention. To be fortunate enough to get a new recruit is nothing short of a miracle in our area. Yes we definetly need new recruits, however I would love to see the ones that are on the roster to be more involved. It seems like one after another concerning volunteer departments, their are a limited portian of the roster personel actually "active". Their lies a issue with equipment, insurance, etc tied up by say 20 guys/gals when of them, you see 9 doing all the work over and over. I hear it said that things cannot be made mandatory since it is volunteer..... I look at it a little different the some. I see myself as a unpaid professional firefighter/responder. It is a job I applied for and was accepted. Had I not been able to fulfill my duties then I should not have applied to begin with. Volunteer or not the job is the same, duties are the same, responsibilities are the same, fire just as hot, injuries just as real.




In My Opinion I see it being taken to lightly to what being a volunteer firefighter really is at times. Maybe I am totally in left field, but for a good number of years now I consistently make calls, training sessions, meetings, clean trucks, repair trucks, fulfill duties at fundraisers, & maintain a complete active status, and if the day comes I cannot do that.............I'll turn in my gear!!!




How wrong is that??




Another little word comes to mind as well. Take it for what it is worth. Again my Opinion ONLY. This is something I keep in check personally.


COMPLACENT




1. Contented to a fault; self-satisfied and unconcerned: He had become complacent after years of success.

0289_max50

45 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 days ago

 

Rayz,


I agree with what you said.  Complacent is a good term.  I find that the stiffer resistance is coming from the older members.  They are still mad that they can not drink at the station anymore, and are filling the heads of the new recruits.  The fire service is an ever evolving child.  New policy and techniques are developed everyday.  I spend over 300 hours a year doing functions for the fire department.  That does not include all the time I spend at home doing papaerwork.  I would rather have a department of 6 that are totally involved, than 22 that show up 5-6 times a year and complain about training.  We do have our crew, we are called the faithful 4.  Short of being out of town, or at work and can't get away, we are almost always there.  All we can do is weed out the ones who do not play well. and nuture the good ones.

011_max50

73 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 days ago

 

At north baldwin we have the same thing a faith ful few that are on every call and you know what three out of those five are lower on the ranks then the others.  My question to you guys is what do you do when the people that have the "its only volunteer" excuse are in officer positions.  Cause it seems like everytime we are at a meeting that phrase comes up.  Mostly when it comes down to the training and the grunt work.  Does anybody have advice on how to curb that additude before it spreads throughout the rest of the members.


North Baldwin 354

Photo_user_blank_big

3 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 days ago

 

this is completly true. people do need to realize this

0289_max50

45 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 9 days ago

 

Snow,


These officers, are they appointed or elected?  If they are appointed and your Chief does nothing, then that is part of the problem.  I have replaced people for this very reason.  If they are elected, vote them out.  If they are officers and that is their attitude, they do not need to be officers.  Officers are supposed to lead the department.  My Captains are in charge of the members under the guidane of the the Chief and I.  I recently had one of the "I am a volunteer" people on a fire.  He never came to training with the others.  When he got all packed up to go in the fire, I told him sorry, he could go help with water supply.  I need people who have trained together and can trust each other.  He was very mad, but I will make that same decision everytime, and my Chief will back me.

Fire7_max50

3 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 9 days ago

 

To think about it, we on our department train two times a month and are always going back to school! We have just rolled out a MABAS ( Mutual Aid Box Alarm System) here in Dane County in the State of Wisconsin, and the rules read with this new system  that you have to be a State Certified Firefighter to jump on the truck to respond to these type of fires. This means that you have to have proper training and have went through the Fire Schools to be able to do anything. I hate the fact that people think that we are just volunteers so we dont have to train, well I am here to tell you they would last about a week on our department. If anything we have to train harder and receive more schooling than Full time guys because we dont alway respond to calls everyday. We pay for our members to go to school a learn and will send them where ever in the country to see that they get the best training. No we are not a paid service and no one complains about this fact, we have roughly about 900 to a 1000 fire and accident calls per year not to mention our EMS service who is right up around 1200 calls per year as well. Our service has a proud history of no loss time deaths because of a Fire Scene, we have been operating for over a 100 years now. This is just my opinion dont take it the wrong way but you can never be to safe or train too much. As soon as you think you have mastered this career it is time to look for a new one. Jeremy in Wisconsin...

0289_max50

45 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 9 days ago

 

Jeremy,


Very nicely put!!!  You have hit the nail on the head.  Thank you.

011_max50

73 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 8 days ago

 

Firenoid5 says ...



Snow,


These officers, are they appointed or elected?  If they are appointed and your Chief does nothing, then that is part of the problem.  I have replaced people for this very reason.  If they are elected, vote them out.  If they are officers and that is their attitude, they do not need to be officers.  Officers are supposed to lead the department.  My Captains are in charge of the members under the guidane of the the Chief and I.  I recently had one of the "I am a volunteer" people on a fire.  He never came to training with the others.  When he got all packed up to go in the fire, I told him sorry, he could go help with water supply.  I need people who have trained together and can trust each other.  He was very mad, but I will make that same decision everytime, and my Chief will back me.



 


well the main person that has this mentality is appointed how I dont really know but he is a leader for the whole town.  and from what I hear and have talked to other members about he used to be one of the front guys to go to if you wanted to know about the fire service.  But somewheres along the line he got complacent with how things were.  The major problem with that is he doesnt understand that there are standards that need to be met and the actual firefighters for the department would like to uphold to as many as we can.  its more of been used as an excuse to prevent a certified training course to be done and to help save money.  As is we already dont have much to hand out.  But A couple of us fear it might either shut us down if we get fined by the department of labor or even worse some one could be hurt or killed do to improper training.


 


In my personal opinion if you are one that says well I am only volunteer I dont have to do this or that.  Your doing more of a disservice to your town.  Yeah you might be ready to go for a fully involved structure but your not at the car accidents in the middle of the night or helping direct traffic for a line down.  And mostly your letting your team down that depends on every member to help out and be involved.


 


~Kevin


North Baldwin 354

100_4830_max50

174 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 days ago

 

I am from a very small town, a hamlet.  In my department we have people that want to commit to the fund raising but will not commit to the calls.  We have like 16 people and that is just enough to run all the equipment.  Many times there are only four or five that show up to calls and that is sickening.  If you volunteer your time to be a volunteer then you need to make the effort to come to calls and training.  I have a family and I am an active duty soldier in the Army, and yet, I still make calls.  So....there is no excuse.  I think there needs to be stronger commitment ties to the community and the fire house if you want to volunteer.

Pb210004_max50

53 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 8 hours ago

 

I learned Saturday at a Leadership and department management training class that voting on membership entry to the department is technically, illegal.


Anyway to respond that it is only a volunteer department. Sounds like there's a little lack of understanding of what a volunteer really is. A volunteer has to do more than is normally expected. That is what a true volunteer is. Volunteer firefighters have to pass the same NFPA 1001 FF1 as career firefighters. The same emt certifications. Take the same NIMS courses.


With the ever increasing fire service demands and the increasing full time job pressures, volunteer FFs are very much in the middle of the squeeze.


Those volunteers that feel they have done enough, well when they get a decade in they can slack off some, but if they are in some particular charge of a responding unit, they need to continue to train for that position. I don't care if they have 67 years in. (I met one yesterday, joined the department at 19 and looked great btw)


A volunteer can decide to slack off from department commitments, but if they do they must not lead.


And to those volunteers attending school or away to Iraq or wherever, you should not have your membership taken away, but instead maybe a reserve status. Your turnouts or wildland ppe's may be needed at the station so happily give it back. Upon your return you should go to the head of the line. Young, strong back of guts young men with prior service usually do.